I stopped posting on LinkedIn in 2019.
I’d built a decent following, written hundreds of posts, accumulated more likes than I care to count. But somewhere along the way the ratio shifted. I was spending more time thinking about how something would land than about whether it said anything worth saying. The work had become a performance. Once I noticed that, I couldn’t find a way back.
I’ve spoken with a lot of senior HR leaders since who have done the same thing, quietly. Not because they’ve run out of things to say. Quite the opposite.
The platform rewards certainty. HR is rarely certain.
Social media algorithms favour a particular kind of thinking – clear, confident, shareable. A strong take travels further than a careful doubt. A personal story outperforms systemic analysis. None of this is sinister; it’s simply how the incentive structure works. But HR, at senior levels, rarely produces clean answers.
The most consequential work happens in conditions that can’t be discussed publicly. A restructure with no good options. A board-level tension that can’t be named. A leadership failure being managed carefully before it surfaces. That kind of thinking doesn’t compress into a post. When you try to force it, something essential gets lost.
The quietest voices often have the most to say.
Most senior HR leaders carry responsibilities that preclude public commentary. Posting means packaging your thinking for an audience. At that level of sensitivity, packaging becomes a form of self-censorship. So they go quiet. Not from a lack of perspective. From an excess of it.
Over time, this produces a visible HR conversation increasingly shaped by those who can afford to be visible, those without the confidentiality constraints, or those willing to abstract their experience into the kind of clean opinion an algorithm can reward. Influence expands. Considered experience retreats.
Influence and thinking are not the same thing.
An influencer shares a perspective with an audience. A thinker sits with a problem long enough to change their mind – holds two contradictory ideas, resists the urge to resolve prematurely, asks the question rather than offering the answer. A platform built around reach makes the second kind of thinking harder, not easier.
The HR profession needs both. But what it tends to get publicly is the first. The second happens quietly, privately, in the margins of the working day.
A different kind of space.
The HR Ghost Lounge was built as a response to exactly this.
Ten anonymous rooms on Signal. One daily prompt. One considered response per member. No replies, no engagement metrics, no personal brand in the room. Senior HR leaders contributing anonymously to a single question, without an audience in view.
The thinking behind it is simple: when professional identity is set aside and the pace is slowed, reflection becomes possible in a different way. The prompt replaces the algorithm. The contribution replaces the post. And the room belongs to everyone in it equally, regardless of how they show up outside of it.
It isn’t for everyone. It isn’t trying to be. But for the HR leaders who have been quietly stepping back from the performance… it exists.
*******
Note: This post was co-written by my AI agent. I was an HR/Recruitment Ghostwriter for more than a decade. You can check out 100+ “old” blogs here. These days, I no longer write for clients, and I choose to use AI to assist my personal writing process. The thoughts are mine. The words are a joint effort.